Product · Understanding context
Before you ask it. The assistant already knows your patterns: who you are, what you work on, what happened lately and what comes next. So "What did we promise them?" lands the way it would with a colleague, and the answer comes back with proof.
Half of every question is setup — who "they" are, which deal, since when. The engine carries that setup for every person, across every connected source, so the short question lands and the answer arrives already holding its documents.
Drives, mailboxes, chat, trackers, the ERP — every source feeds one permission-aware index, capturing the content, the people around it and who may read what, together.
Every data source ›
Ask with the words your team actually uses — initials, codenames, "their", "the latest". The entity registry resolves them to the right client, project and document before searching starts, so a four-word ask finds the governing contract.
How answers work ›
Beyond indexing content, the engine distils it into a knowledge graph: people, companies, projects and deals, with the real relations between them. "Them", "that deal", "her team" — resolved to the right things before searching even starts.
See the graph in the live demo ›
The same question means different things from finance and from support. Answers are situated in the asker's role, groups, history and permissions — and every claim lands with the citation that backs it.
How permissions work ›
Web chat, the channels your team already lives in, and an API & MCP plane for your own tools and agents — one context behind every door, permission-filtered at each.
Messaging & channels ›
One admin key opens the whole deployment to your code and your AI assistants — ask, add documents, run the console. Plain REST on one side, MCP on the other, every action audited and permission-filtered.
See it in the live demo ›
Because it already knows your patterns. It knows who you are, what you work on, what you asked before and what changed around you lately, so it reads a question the way a colleague at the next desk would, and it already knows which corner of the company record the answer lives in.
It is not allowed to speak without evidence. Every claim cites a passage from your own documents, and an answer it cannot back is an answer it does not give. You can stop worrying about invented facts; the mechanics are written up in the docs.
It happens in every company, and the assistant is built for it: newer and more authoritative documents win, an executed contract outranks a draft, and the answer cites the document that carried the day so you can check it yourself.
You get an honest "I don't have that in the knowledge base." No answer is invented; there is no answer without a source.
Yes. Dates are computed, never guessed, and "latest", "current" and "as of March" resolve against the documents' own dates. If date handling is the thing your team worries about, the docs walk through exactly how it works.
Ask in your language and it answers in kind; Greek, English and mixed corpora are normal. Conversations persist per person, so follow-up questions carry their context.
Every paste into a consumer chatbot is a question your own systems could not answer fast enough. Security vendors sell detection, which reads the app and never the question. What the 2026 breach data actually shows, how far Microsoft's new Shadow AI controls really reach, and why the only fix that scales is making the company answerable.
Glean is Google for your company: it finds where things are stored. Naxis is the private knowledge engine that knows what is actually true right now. Different machines, different questions, different prices. An honest way to choose, and the Glean alternative for companies of 5 to 200 people.
Lidl wrote off €500 million trying. Birmingham City Council is £144 million in and reinstalling from scratch. Consolidation megaprojects fail for a structural reason: real work is too fluid to hold one shape. The part you actually wanted, one place to ask, never needed the migration.
